Have you ever been deterred by the high Gas Fees on Ethereum? Or felt impatient with the slow transaction confirmation times? These pain points actually stem from the Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism that Ethereum previously relied on. To address these growing bottlenecks, the “Ethereum Upgrade” (formerly known as “Ethereum 2.0”), the most anticipated performance revolution in blockchain history, has begun.
This article will take you on a deep dive into this revolution from the perspective of a seasoned investor. We will break down the core Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, key upgrade stages, and its historical connection with Ethereum Classic (ETC), helping you understand all the crucial knowledge and see through the future trends of blockchain.
💡 Core Concept: “Ethereum 2.0” is not the issuance of a new currency but a series of major upgrades to the existing Ethereum network, aimed at improving its performance, security, and sustainability.
First, let’s clear up a common misconception: there is no new token called “ETH 2.0” on the market. The so-called “Ethereum 2.0” is a collective term used by the Ethereum Foundation and the community for a series of major network upgrades. The core objective of these upgrades is to transition Ethereum’s consensus mechanism from PoW to PoS and introduce scaling technologies like sharding.
You can think of it not as scrapping an old car for a new one, but as changing the engine, tires, and operating system of a race car while it’s speeding down the highway. This is an extremely complex and massive undertaking aimed at making Ethereum faster, cheaper, and more environmentally friendly.
Why did Ethereum have to undergo this “open-heart surgery”? Because the old PoW mechanism was dragging down its development, mainly manifested in the following three dilemmas:
The soul of this upgrade is the complete overhaul of the consensus mechanism. Let’s take a look at the differences between the two.
PoW is like a never-ending math competition. “Miners” around the world use computing power to solve a complex mathematical problem. The first one to solve it gets to package the latest block of transactions and receives new ETH as a reward. This “brute-force” method ensures network security, but it is also the root of its high energy consumption and low efficiency.
PoS (Proof-of-Stake) changes the game entirely. It’s no longer about who has more computing power, but who has a larger “stake”. Users who want to participate in packaging blocks (validating transactions) need to first “stake” a certain amount of ETH (currently 32 ETH) in the network as a security deposit.
The system then randomly selects a “validator” to create a new block based on factors like the amount and duration of the stake. Upon success, the validator receives network rewards. This method is like a fixed-term deposit in a bank: the more money (staked ETH) you deposit and the longer you keep it there, the greater your chance of earning interest (block rewards). It eliminates the need for massive computing power, fundamentally solving the energy problem.
You might ask: if PoS doesn’t rely on computing power, how does it prevent validators from acting maliciously (e.g., validating fraudulent transactions)? This is where the Casper protocol comes in.
Casper is the set of reward and penalty rules behind Ethereum’s PoS mechanism. If a validator acts honestly, they receive a reward. But if they attempt to attack the network or break the rules, a portion of their staked ETH will be confiscated by the system—a process called “slashing”. This “carrot and stick” approach ensures that validators have a strong incentive to maintain the network’s integrity and security.
To help you understand the differences more clearly, here is a comparison table:
| Feature | PoW (Proof-of-Work) | PoS (Proof-of-Stake) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Consumption | Extremely high (comparable to a country) | Extremely low (reduced by ~99.95%) |
| Transaction Speed (TPS) | Low (approx. 15-30) | High (can reach 100,000+ with sharding) |
| Security | Relies on immense computing power; high attack cost | Relies on economic penalties (Slashing); attack cost is also extremely high |
| Barrier to Entry | High (requires expensive, specialized mining rigs) | Lower (can stake ETH, participation via pools is possible) |
The entire Ethereum upgrade process was not completed overnight but was carried out in several key phases.
Launched in December 2020, the Beacon Chain can be seen as the “testing ground” or “command center” for the PoS system. It ran independently of the then-active PoW mainnet, allowing developers and the community to test and refine the PoS consensus rules without affecting the mainnet’s normal operations.
“The Merge” was the climatic step of the entire upgrade process, successfully executed in September 2022. It officially merged the long-running Ethereum PoW mainnet (the execution layer) with the PoS Beacon Chain (the consensus layer). From that moment on, Ethereum’s consensus mechanism permanently shifted from PoW to PoS, officially ending the mining era.
The Merge solved the energy problem, but to truly address scalability, “sharding” technology is needed. Sharding is like adding 64 or more parallel lanes to a congested single-lane highway. The network’s database will be “sharded” into multiple smaller parts, processed simultaneously by different groups of validators. This will dramatically increase the network’s throughput, theoretically boosting TPS to tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands, finally saying goodbye to congestion and exorbitant Gas Fees.
When talking about Ethereum, one cannot ignore its “twin brother”—Ethereum Classic (ETC). Their creation stemmed from a famous “hard fork” event.
A hard fork is a permanent change to the rules of a blockchain network where the new rules are incompatible with the old ones. You can think of it as a mandatory software update. Everyone must upgrade to the new version, or they will be left on the old network. If the community is deeply divided over the update, with one part choosing to upgrade and another insisting on the old version, the blockchain will split into two independent chains.
In 2016, a decentralized autonomous organization called “The DAO” was launched on Ethereum and successfully raised ETH worth $150 million at the time. However, due to a vulnerability in its smart contract, The DAO was hacked, and about one-third of the funds were stolen. This caused a huge shock in the Ethereum community at the time.
To resolve The DAO crisis, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin and the majority of the community decided to execute a hard fork. By modifying the code, they “rolled back” the blockchain to a state before the hack, thereby recovering the stolen funds. This new, modified chain is what we know today as ETH (Ethereum).
However, a small part of the community firmly believed that “Code is Law,” arguing that the blockchain’s history should not be tampered with by anyone, even to correct a mistake. They chose to continue maintaining the original, unmodified blockchain. This chain became ETC (Ethereum Classic).
From then on, the two chains went their separate ways, each developing independently. ETH chose a path of continuous upgrades and evolution (like the current PoS upgrade), while ETC continued to adhere to the PoW mechanism, preserving its original form.
💡 Recommended Article
Want to learn more about the basics of blockchain? Recommended reading:
[The Ultimate Guide to Web3] Understand Blockchain Applications, DePIN, TGE & IEO in One Article
Ethereum’s PoS upgrade is more than just a technical iteration; it is a crucial step for the blockchain industry toward maturity and sustainable development. By shifting to a more environmentally friendly and efficient PoS mechanism and planning an ambitious scaling roadmap including sharding, it not only addresses the performance bottlenecks that have long plagued users but also paves the way for the future development of decentralized applications.
From the wild era of PoW to the efficient era of PoS, from the hard fork triggered by The DAO incident to the historic handshake of The Merge, Ethereum’s development history is filled with challenges and choices. As an investor or blockchain enthusiast, a deep understanding of the context and core technologies of this upgrade will help you more accurately grasp the future pulse of the crypto world and make wiser decisions.
CashbackIsland continuously updates trading educational resources. Traders can visit the “CashbackIsland Trading Guides” section to master more foreign exchange knowledge and investment skills.
Not at all. This upgrade is seamless for the average user. The ETH you hold in your wallet (whether a cold or hot wallet) or on an exchange requires no action on your part. It will automatically transition to the new PoS chain, and both the amount and value will remain unaffected.
Not immediately. “The Merge” itself primarily addresses the energy consumption issue, not Gas Fees. The level of Gas Fees depends on the network’s supply and demand (i.e., the ratio of transaction processing capacity to transaction demand). The technology that will significantly reduce Gas Fees is “sharding,” which is planned for a future implementation and will greatly increase the network’s processing capacity.
To become an independent validator, you need to stake 32 ETH and run your own validator node, which has certain technical and financial requirements. For the average investor, a more convenient way to participate is through “staking pools” or staking services offered by centralized exchanges. You can stake any amount of ETH, share a node with others, and receive a proportional share of the rewards, which significantly lowers the barrier to entry.
After “The Merge,” the original Ethereum PoW chain was completely replaced by the PoS chain. However, some mining communities committed to PoW may hard fork the old chain to create a new PoW branch (e.g., ETHW). But the consensus, value, and ecosystem of these forked chains are far inferior to the upgraded mainnet, and investors should be aware of the associated risks.
“Trading financial derivatives involves high risks and may result in the loss of funds. The content of this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Please make decisions carefully based on your personal financial situation. CashbackIsland assumes no responsibility for any trading derivatives.”
